Skip to content
Central Square in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Photo Credit: Eric Kilby
Another day, yet another Suno class action lawsuit, filed, like at least two others before it, over the AI music platform’s alleged November 2025 data breach.
A South Dakota-based Suno user named Michael Beckham submitted the straightforward suit to a Massachusetts federal court closer to September’s beginning. Naming the Cambridge-headquartered company as the lone defendant, the complaint, many will recognize, resembles a pair of recently consolidated class actions centering on the same alleged incident.
In short, a bad actor (or actors) allegedly obtained some 55 million Suno accountholders’ “personal information” last year. The platform, for its part, allegedly failed to acknowledge the alleged occurrence in a timely fashion.
To be sure, the alleged hack only came to light (and set the stage for litigation) after it was identified in July 2026 by breach-notification service Have I Been Pwned.
But Beckham, like the plaintiffs in the similar suits, claims he “experienced an increase in unsolicited spam telephone calls and phishing attempts” post-breach.
Additionally, he “spent approximately ten hours investigating the incident, attempting to protect his other online accounts, reviewing and strengthening account security, monitoring for misuse, and consulting counsel regarding protective measures and his legal rights,” per the text.
Now, the filing party is seeking relief for negligence, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and more.
While time will tell how the case plays out, amid a steady stream of successful attempts to enforce arbitration provisions, Beckham is adamant that Suno didn’t provide “reasonably conspicuous notice of any arbitration agreement, class waiver, delegation clause, limitation period, liability cap, or other disputed term.”
In the bigger picture, the suit is just the latest active complaint against Warner Music-partnered Suno, which is separately embroiled in courtroom confrontations with Universal Music and Sony Music; indie artists; SOCAN; Latin label Gerencia 360; Jason Isbell, David Lowery, and others; Round Hill; and GEMA.
We’ve covered each of those complaints in detail, but given the volume at hand, it probably won’t come as a surprise that a couple smaller-scale suits have largely flown under the radar.
Texas-based “More Than Rich” artist JoeCat is currently spearheading a pro se complaint (26-12830) against Suno for allegedly training on his music without authorization, for instance.
Also unfolding is a case (26-06165) filed in late July by “a totally blind individual,” Nick Gawronski, who maintains that Suno violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
According to the action, Texas-based Gawronski, currently “pursuing a data-driven education in audio engineering,” is unable to “operate standard computers, smartphones, or digital interfaces without the assistance of specialized screen access software.”
And Suno allegedly violated the ADA “by constructing, deploying, and maintaining a” platform and interface “that are completely inaccessible to the blind and visually impaired who, like Plaintiff, rely on screen-reading technology.”
